Rob 22:14, 8 January 2006 (UTC) I agree too. A list of their names and maybe a quick description would be enough for me. I don't really need to know what each bot does.
DIABLO II PATCH 1.13 NEW MYSTERY HOW TO
That's like having an article on DVDs of which one third is devoted to how to crack copy protection. It's bad enough that grab and map hacks even exist, no reason to elaborate on them, considering it's still a violation of the TOS and by extension the law. Rob 22:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC) Delete all the hack stuff ffs I'd take the view that all builds and skills should be italicized as it outlines them as being game-specific terms. Odysseyandoracle 08:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC) While cleaning this article I found a lot of what you are talking about. But it has to be decided one way or the other and made consistent throughout the entire article. Personally I think the italics have been completely overdone.I don't see the purpose of italicizing anything here. The same is true of the nicknames for the various class builds (hammerdin, etc.). The names of the difficulties are italicized in some places, not in others. Some consensus has to be reached on the usage of italics in this seems to be almost at random. Krainert ( talk) 19:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Italics Usage Someone with sufficient knowledge should probably add a short story section to the article. The amount of events of major significance to the main storyline is limited but worth mentioning, and the numerous parallel plots, including the story of Harrogath, are notable as well. Will somebody add this in? - Phorque 16:49, 15 January 2006 (UTC) Agreed. I'm too rusty on this aspect and don't have the game installed right now to refresh my memory. Gjc8 05:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC) Plot Īlthough I tend to forget/ignore LoD having any plot, it does, and I suppose it would make sense to have a section on what happens in Act V and how the game ends/possibility of sequels etc. Brother Laz 11:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC) At a minimum, the opinions about the different classes and skills need to be sourced. Those who're about to get reverted, salute you. I think what's holding back many ppl is that a sweeping revision would require the deletion of pretty much everything, get a lot of ppl angry and likely cause an edit war. 60.227.18.58 04:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC) This is an article you don't usually find in an encyclopedia, so the contributors are usually just fans. Just because someone has something unpleasant to say about class X or class Y, doesn't mean that what they've said is incorrect. The comments about the Amazon's bugged fend, the 1.11/1.11b perfectly built and equipped Paladin's damn-near-demigod status, or the Druid's summoning tree being nigh on useless, are all examples of indeniable facts. Either of the Amazon's two most popular builds, javazon or bowazon, could mop the floor with their intended opposition.
In that case, whirlwind was imbalanced, it was significantly overpowered. I remember when whirlwind Barbarians were king, nigh on invincible. The imbalance can be in specific instances, or in general. If a class X can in theory be as powerful as class Y, but is almost never in practice, you can construe that in two ways either the player is lacking in skill or the class is imbalanced. Unlike you, I would contend that the so-called 'bias' in this article is justified. Akaroo 02:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC) I have also played through the entire Diablo series. This article needs dozens of hours worth of editing before it will be even remotely 'wikipedic'. Wikipedia articles need to remain neutral.Īfter trying to remove some of the disgusting ammount of bias in this article, I have come to realize that nearly the entire thing is filled with personal opinions/strategies and pages worth of useless information. Even though I agree with a select few of the biases mentioned, they all need to go. By the guidelines of wikipedia, this article is in need of a massive revision in order to remove these biases. However, I've noticed considerable bias on this page regarding which classes were over/underpowered.
0 kommentar(er)
